USPTO serial 75593056
GOIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROCHELLE D ALPERT
ROCHELLE D ALPERT BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWR1 MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, NAMELY, BASE TRANSCEIVER STATIONS, TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN CONTROLLING WIRELESS OPERATIONS USED IN THE FIELD OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; WIRELESS BASE STATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN RADIO FREQUENCY PLANNING APPLICATIONS USED IN THE FIELD OF COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |