Drawing for HI-LITE BEVELED GLASS

USPTO serial 75593175

HI-LITE BEVELED GLASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI-LITE BEVELED GLASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN E. HALAMKA

JOHN E HALAMKA LAW OFFICE OF JOHN E HALAMKA21515 HAWTHORNE BLVD STE 590TORRANCE, CA 90503UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021DINNERWARE, CLASS WARE, NAMELY DECORATIVE GLASS CLUSTERS, ART WARE, NAMELY INDIVIDUAL GLASS SEGMENTS, STAINED GLASS, JADE COLORED ART GLASS AND CRYSTAL BLOCKS FOR EXECUTION OF ARTS AND CRAFTS DESIGNSACTIVEMar 1, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance