Drawing for DR. READING

USPTO serial 75593209

DR. READING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. READING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly G. Russell

Eugene M. Pak, Esq. DLA Piper LLP US555 Mission Street, 24th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM, prerecorded audio cassettes and DVDs all consisting of teaching and instruction materials for the purpose of training teachers and administrators to enhance their skills in the teaching of readingACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes and workshops using television programs, and an interactive website, in the field of training teachers and administrators to enhance their skills in the teaching of readingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 11, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 12, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 10, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 12, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance