CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GREENVILLE UTILITIES

USPTO serial 75593300

GREENVILLE UTILITIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2721642Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 3, 2003
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with GREENVILLE UTILITIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark W. Ishman

Mark W. Ishman Ishman Law Firm, PC9660 Falls of Neuse RoadSuite 138-350Raleigh, NC 27615

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Municipal utilities services, in the nature of the distribution of electricity, distribution of water, and distribution of natural gas through pipe linesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 1, 1998
040Waste water treatment servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 22, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 7, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 5, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Dec 17, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 22, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance