USPTO serial 75593457
A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Svat
MARK S SVAT FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, MINNICH1100 SUPERIOR AVESEVENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY ELECTRONIC AND ELECTRICAL CIRCUITRY, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS; COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE FOR CONNECTING COMPUTER NETWORK USERS TO GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO CONTROL AND IMPROVE COMPUTER AND AUDIO EQUIPMENT SOUND QUALITY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO ENHANCE THE AUDIO-VISUAL CAPABILITIES OF MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, FOR THE INTEGRATION OF TEXT, AUDIO, GRAPHICS, STILL IMAGES AND MOVING PICTURES; COMPUTER TELEPHONY SOFTWARE TO ENABLE TELEPHONE ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED THROUGH A COMPUTER; AND INTELLIGENT APPLIANCE OPERATING SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |