USPTO serial 75593472
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard R. Gans
BERNARD R GANS JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO2121 AVE OF THE STARS FL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5010UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE FIELDS OF AEROSPACE, AVIONICS, AUTOMOTIVE, TRANSPORTATION, BIOMEDICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY, CHEMICAL, NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, SEMICONDUCTORS, COMPUTER COMPONENTS, COMPUTER SUBASSEMBLIES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ENGINEERING, DESIGN, CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, APPLIANCES, ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, ELECTRONICS, INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS, ROBOTICS, LASERS, ELECTRO-OPTICAL, MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, OFFICE AND BUSINESS MACHINES, TEST AND MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT, CONSULTING CONTRACT MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTORSHIP AND DISTRIBUTION, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT, MILITARY, AND UNIVERSITY AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING INFORMATION TO AND ABOUT JOB APPLICANTS FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE FIELDS OF AEROSPACE, AVIONICS, AUTOMOTIVE, TRANSPORTATION, BIOMEDICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY, CHEMICAL, NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, SEMICONDUCTORS, COMPUTER COMPONENTS, COMPUTER SUBASSEMBLIES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ENGINEERING, DESIGN, CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, APPLIANCES, ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, ELECTRONICS, INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS, ROBOTICS, LASERS, ELECTRO-OPTICAL, MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, OFFICE AND BUSINESS MACHINES, TEST AND MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT, CONSULTING, CONTRACT MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTORSHIP AND DISTRIBUTION, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT, MILITARY, AND UNIVERSITY AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTERS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |