USPTO serial 75593903
YEGUADA DE LA CARTUJA HIERRO DEL BOCADO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YEGUADA DE LA CARTUJA HIERRO DEL BOCADO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXPASA AGRICULTURA Y GANADERIA S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named YEGUADA DE LA CARTUJA HIERRO DEL BOCADO
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |