USPTO serial 75594301
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S. Berman,
ROD S BERMAN JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP2121 AVE OF THE STARS10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | RENTAL SERVICES, NAMELY, RENTAL OF TRUCKS, TRAILERS, VANS, AUTOMOBILES, RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, AUTOMOBILE FREIGHT TRAILERS, RAMPS, HITCHES, PADS, TOW BARS, DOLLIES, CARRIERS, HAND TRUCKS, CAMPER JACKS, MOVING EQUIPMENT, CANOES, BOATS, BOAT MOTORS, BOAT TRAILERS, VEHICLES, MOVING VANS; GENERAL STORAGE SERVICES; RENTAL OF WAREHOUSE SPACE; WAREHOUSE STORAGE SERVICES; RENTAL OF GARAGE SPACE; PARKING LOT SERVICES; RENTAL OF PARKING SPACES; CARGO HANDLING, CARGO UNLOADING; MOVING VAN SERVICES, MOVING VAN TRANSPORT; RENTAL OF MOVING VANS; FURNITURE MOVING; DELIVERY OF GOODS BY TRUCK, CAR OR VAN; TRUCK HAULING, TRUCK TOWING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |