USPTO serial 75594628
RETAILTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RETAILTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara L. Waite
BARBARA L WAITE VENABLE BAETJER HOWARD & CIVILETTI1201 NEW YORK AVE N WSTE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL DEPARTMENT STORE SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |