USPTO serial 75594736
BUYSITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2001
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUYSITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Walnut Creek, CA
Walnut Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P. Bridges
ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for facilitating procurement of goods and services via electronic communications networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |