USPTO serial 75594814
BASE TEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BASE TEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lancashire BB2 4PJ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Bikoff
JAMES L BIKOFF ARTER & HADDEN LLP1801 K ST NWSTE 400KWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | GEOSYNTHETIC MATERIALS FOR USE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING OR CONSTRUCTION; GEOTEXTILES FOR USE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING; GEOTEXTILES FOR USE IN SOIL REINFORCEMENT, STABILIZATION, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL; GEOTEXTILES FOR REINFORCEMENT OF ASPHALT OR CONCRETE; GEOTEXTILES FOR USE IN RIVER, COASTAL AND WATERWAY PROTECTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TEXTILES AND FABRICS FOR USE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING OR CONSTRUCTION; TEXTILES AND FABRICS FOR USE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING; TEXTILES AND FABRICS FOR USE IN SOIL REINFORCEMENT, STABILIZATION, DRAINAGE OR EROSION CONTROL; TEXTILES AND FABRICS FOR REINFORCEMENT OF ASPHALT OR CONCRETE; TEXTILES AND FABRICS FOR USE IN RIVER, COASTAL AND WATERWAY PROTECTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |