Drawing for RELIEF PATCH

USPTO serial 75594879

RELIEF PATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELIEF PATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caroline E. Papas

CAROLINE E PAPAS CALENDAR/DOCKET DEPTPILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPP O BOX 7880SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Nerve stimulation therapy device, consisting of two electrodes, battery, casing and circuitry, which send electrical impulses to the median nerve in order to control nausea and vomiting, sold without medicationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 21, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 21, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 5, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 24, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 20, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 11, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 13, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 22, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 1, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 22, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 30, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 12, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 3, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance