USPTO serial 75595001
PINAR SASAL SPRING WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PINAR SASAL SPRING WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yadex Export-Import und Spedition GmbH
60314 Frankfurt am Main, DE
Other trademarks owned by Yadex Export-Import und Spedition GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP D MITCHELL
PHILIP D MITCHELL EPSTEIN BECKER AND GREEN PC250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177-0077UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | bottled spring water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |