USPTO serial 75595064
DCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milpitas, CA
Milpitas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BO-IN LIN
13445 MANDOLI DRLOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022-1925UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROCOMPUTERS, MICRO-CONTROLLERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR THE TRANSMISSION AND RECEIPT OF FACSIMILES, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND USE OF LOCAL AND WIDE AREA COMPUTER WIRE AND WIRELESS NETWORKS, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND USE OF INTERACTIVE AUDIO-VIDEO COMPUTER CONFERENCE SYSTEMS, AND FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE AND USE OF BROADCAST VIDEO, AUDIO, AND DIGITAL DATA SIGNALS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE, COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS, COMPUTER FIRMWARE FOR USE IN NETWORK DATA TRANSMISSION, CONTROLLING SYSTEM OPERATION OF DATA-HANDLING SYSTEMS AND FOR EXECUTING DIGITAL INSTRUCTIONS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CHIPS; SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSORS; SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSOR CHIPS; MICROPROCESSORS; PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS; ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT BOARDS; AUDIO CIRCUIT BOARDS; AUDIO-VIDEO CIRCUIT BOARDS; VIDEO GRAPHIC ACCELERATORS; MULTIMEDIA ACCELERATORS; VIDEO PROCESSORS; FAX/MODEMS; COMPUTER SYSTEM COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO FUNCTION AS DEVICE DRIVERS, MANAGE COMMUNICATION INTERFACE, AND DATA TRANSMISSION BETWEEN DIFFERENT DATA STORAGE DEVICE AND PROCESSORS, FIRMWARE EXTENSIONS, COMPUTER UTILITY SOFTWARE AND APPLICATION SOFTWARE FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT, INFORMATION PRESENTATION, AND USER INTERFACE MANAGEMENT, FOR CONNECTING PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK APPLICATIONS; AUDIO AND VIDEO GRAPHICS EMBODIED IN MEMORY CARDS FOR REAL TIME INFORMATION AND IMAGE TRANSFER, TRANSMISSION, RECEPTION, PROCESSING, AND DIGITIZING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |