Drawing for CLEARSTAR ADVANTAGE PLUS

USPTO serial 75595200

CLEARSTAR ADVANTAGE PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEARSTAR ADVANTAGE PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL W. GARRITY

PAUL W GARRITY KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP101 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, VIDEO AND DATA BY ELECTRONIC MEANS AND FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS OFFERED FROM THE TELECOMMUNICATION PROVIDER'S CENTRAL OFFICEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2002ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Apr 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Feb 3, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 4, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 4, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 14, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance