Drawing for WWWEB IMPRESSIONS

USPTO serial 75595241

WWWEB IMPRESSIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WWWEB IMPRESSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIRK M. HARTUNG

KIRK M HARTUNG ZARLEY MCKEE THOMTE VOORHEES & SEASE801 GRAND AVESTE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FOR OTHERS OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK WEBSITESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 19, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 29, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 6, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 28, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 18, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance