USPTO serial 75595279
A CALIFORNIA ALMONDS ARE IN!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2507500Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2001
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with A CALIFORNIA ALMONDS ARE IN!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WENDY J. PIFHER
WENDY J. PIFHER HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH STREETSUITE 3200DENVER, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | ready to eat, almond based food bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 1998 |
| 030 | almond paste; candy, ice cream, frozen yogurt, non-dairy frozen confections, breakfast cereals, bakery products, food bars ready to eat, pudding, and baking mixes, all containing almonds; almond syrup; sauces and coatings containing almonds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 1998 |
| 031 | Unprocessed and raw almonds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Almond Board of California, The
- Other trademarks owned by Almond Board of California, The
- Other trademarks owned by Almond Board of California, The
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named A CALIFORNIA ALMONDS ARE IN!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |