USPTO serial 75595412
CANDYS BY JAZZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2696020Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2003
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CANDYS BY JAZZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WEST PISCATAWAY, NJ
Carteret, NJ
Carteret, NJ
Carteret, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Reisman
JAMES REISMAN GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photographic cameras | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JAZZ PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Jazz Photo Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Jazz Photo Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Jazz Photo Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CANDYS BY JAZZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |