Drawing for SKY VISTA

USPTO serial 75595443

SKY VISTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SKY VISTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Stanton Dodge

R STANTON DODGE CORPORATE COUNSELSKY VISTA CORPORATION90 INVERNESS CIR EENGLEWOOD, CO 80112

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications equipment, namely, signal frequency receivers, antennae for receiving signal frequencies, and parts therefor; communications software, namely, system operating software for residential and commercial satellite receiver systems; satellite receivers, antennae, low noise converters, feed horns, amplifiers, actuators, modulators, coaxial/custom cables, decoders and encryption equipment, all for residential and commercial satellite receiver systems; option/peripheral modules for residential and commercial satellite receivers; personal computer receiver cards; interactive data equipment for residential and commercial satellite receiver systems, video distribution systems, namely, for residential and commercial satellite receiver systems, for the purpose of transmitting audio, video and data signals from a domestic communication satellite to residential and commercial satellite receiver systems and/or television systems; telephone extension circuitry; micro-processor based plastic cards which interface with/comprise the residential and commercial satellite receiver security system, software reflecting the on-screen listing of available programming; remote controls; parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods; and operator maintenance, and instructional manual distributed therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance