Drawing for DIGITAL FAIR

USPTO serial 75595490

DIGITAL FAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SELTZER, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL FAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BERNARD R GANS

BERNARD R GANS JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MOTION PICTURE FILMS, AND PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS, LASER DISCS, CD ROMS, DVDS, DVD ROMS, VIDEO TAPES, CASSETTES, AND OTHER PRE-RECORDED OPTICAL, ELECTRONIC, AND MAGNETIC MEDIA FEATURING PUBLIC RELATIONS CONTENT, THE PROMOTION OF TRAVEL, AND THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS IN NATIONS, STATES, PROVINCES, AND/OR CITIES WORLDWIDEACTIVE—
035PUBLIC RELATIONS; PROMOTING TRAVEL AND THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS VIA A WEB PAGE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRERECORDED FILMS, COMPACT DISCS, LASER DISCS, CD ROMS, DVDS, DVD ROMS, VIDEO TAPES, AND CASSETTES AND OTHER OPTICAL, MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC PLAYBACK MEDIA; DISTRIBUTORSHIPS IN THE FIELD OF FILM AND PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS, LASER DISCS, CD ROMS, DVDS, DVD ROMS, VIDEO TAPE CASSETTES AND OTHER OPTICAL, MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC PLAYBACK MEDIAACTIVE—
041PRODUCTION OF FILM AND PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS, LASER DISCS, CD ROMS, DVDS, DVD ROMS, VIDEO TAPE CASSETTES AND OTHER OPTICAL, MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC PLAYBACK MEDIAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 16, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 24, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 12, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 4, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 20, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 21, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance