USPTO serial 75595539
INTERACTION ASSOCIATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERACTION ASSOCIATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE W SCHWAB
Brian L. Michaelis Seyfarth Shaw LLPTwo Seaport Lane, Suite 300Seyfarth Shaw LLPBoston, MA 02210-2028Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL AND PRINTED COURSE MATERIAL USED IN TRAINING IN PROBLEM SOLVING, PERFORMING EFFECTIVELY, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, AND CHANGE IN THE WORKPLACE, FOSTERING COMMUNICATION, BUILDING AGREEMENT AMONG MEMBERS OF GROUPS, AND BUSINESS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR EXECUTIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TRAINING IN PROBLEM SOLVING, PERFORMING EFFECTIVELY, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, AND CHANGE IN THE WORKPLACE, FOSTERING COMMUNICATION, BUILDING AGREEMENT AMONG MEMBERS OF GROUPS, AND BUSINESS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR EXECUTIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING TRAINING WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF GROUP PROBLEM SOLVING, PERFORMING EFFECTIVELY, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, AND CHANGE IN THE WORKPLACE, FOSTERING COMMUNICATION, BUILDING AGREEMENT AMONG MEMBERS OF GROUPS, AND BUSINESS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR EXECUTIVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |