USPTO serial 75595904
U.S. POLO ASS'N 1890
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with U.S. POLO ASS'N 1890?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Ralph King
GERALD J. FERGUSON Baker & Hostetler LLP3200 National City Center1900 East 9th StreetCleveland, OH 44114-3485Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS AND FRAGRANCES, NAMELY TOILET WATER, COLOGNE, PERFUME, AND SHAMPOO; SKIN, HAIR, BATH, SHOWER AND SHAVING SOAPS, CREAMS, LOTIONS AND GELS; DEODORANTS AND ANTI-PERSPIRANTS | ABANDONED | Apr 11, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |