USPTO serial 75596305
THE SMARTYKIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2713730Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 2003
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SMARTYKIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Nguyen
Miriam Claire Beezy FOLEY & LARDNER LLP555 South Flower StreetSuite 3500Los Angeles, CA 90071-2411Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS AND AUDIO TAPES FEATURING CHILDREN'S SONGS AND MUSIC | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 1999 |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY PUBLICATION OF BOOKS, NAMELY PRE-PRINTED BOOKS CONTAINING CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL AND DRAWINGS FOR USE BY PARENTS AND TEACHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kruger, Jonathan H.
- Other trademarks owned by Kruger, Jonathan H.
- Other trademarks owned by Kruger, Jonathan H.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE SMARTYKIDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |