USPTO serial 75596311
SCAVENTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2004
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCAVENTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC C. DEVENNY
ERIC C DEVENNY RIDOUT & MAYBEE LLP1 CITY CTR DR STE 308MISSISSAUGA, ON L5B 1M2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | equipment sold as a unit for playing a parlour and card game, and printed books and pamphlets containing instructions and information sold together as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |