USPTO serial 75596339
HAITIAN DAY PARADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAITIAN DAY PARADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, shirts, shorts, skirts, sweaters, jackets, coats, undergarments, namely, underwears, socks, headgear, namely, caps, hats, yamakahs, helmets, headbands, sweatbands, headwears, footwear, namely, sneakers, shoes, sandals, moccasins, slippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |