USPTO serial 75596624
DCC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DCC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard H. Zaitlen
RICHARD H ZAITLEN PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP725 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 92626-7122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production of motion pictures, slide shows, light shows, audio and video recordings, and preparation of special effects; production of live musical and theatrical performances; and entertainment services in the nature of production of motion pictures, slide shows, light shows, audio and video recordings, special effects, and live musical and theatrical performances comprising or featured at corporate promotional events and sporting events | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing and decorating corporate promotional exhibits for others at conventions, trade shows, corporate special events and museums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |