CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ICONTROL

USPTO serial 75596627

ICONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2407438Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2000
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ICONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell H. Stabbe

Mitchell H. Stabbe Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP1800 M Street, N.W.Suite 800NWashington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009REMOTE CONTROLS THAT OPERATE AND AUTOMATE HOME ENTERTAINMENT AND HOME ELECTRONICSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 2, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 21, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2010RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 9, 201089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 7, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 4, 2010E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 20078.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 23, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 21, 20068.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Nov 21, 2006ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2000R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 5, 2000CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 16, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2000REINREINSTATED—
May 11, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance