USPTO serial 75596643
VAGENENDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2958862Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2005
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VAGENENDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOCIETE ANONYME RESTAURANT VAGENENDE
PARIS, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME RESTAURANT VAGENENDE
SOCIETE ANONYME RESTAURANT VAGENENDE
PARIS, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME RESTAURANT VAGENENDE
SOCIETE ANONYME RESTAURANT VAGENENDE
PARIS, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME RESTAURANT VAGENENDE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Brooke
Thomas W. Brooke HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPSUITE 1002099 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, WINES, SPARKLING WINES, CHAMPAGNES, CIDERS, DISTILLED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES MADE FROM CEREALS, FRUITS OR VEGETABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | HOTEL SERVICES, RESTAURANT SERVICES, CATERING AND SOMMELIER SERVICES, CAFETERIA, CAFE-RESTAURANT AND BAR SERVICES; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING A COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELDS OF FOODSTUFFS, BEVERAGES, RESTAURANT AND HOTEL SERVICES; PROFESSIONAL CONSULTATIONS IN THE FIELDS OF RESTAURANT AND HOTEL SERVICES; RESEARCH LABORATORIES IN THE FIELDS OF FOODSTUFFS AND BEVERAGES; ENGINEERING SERVICES; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF FOODSTUFFS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME RESTAURANT VAGENENDE
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME RESTAURANT VAGENENDE
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE ANONYME RESTAURANT VAGENENDE
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VAGENENDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS NOT UPDATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |