Drawing for CANDY PLANET

USPTO serial 75596667

CANDY PLANET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANDY PLANET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN C. SHIN

SUSAN C SHIN BROWN RAYSMAN MILLSTEIN FELDER & STEINER900 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4728UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030HOUSE MARK FOR A FULLS LINE OF CANDY, ICE CREAM AND FROZEN CONFECTIONS SOLD SEPARATELY AND AS A UNIT WITH TOYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 17, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 25, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 16, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 2, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance