USPTO serial 75597111
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec H3B 4X5, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lucille P. Nichols
LUCILLE P NICHOLS DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CREATING A VIRTUAL STORE ON A COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PROVIDING ADVERTISING AND MARKETING SERVICES THROUGH A COMPUTER NETWORK, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS AND PROMOTIONAL DISPLAYS ON A WEBSITE AND DELIVERING ADVERTISEMENTS AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR THE TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION; PROVIDING AN ONLINE LINK TO NEWS, WEATHER, SPORTS, CURRENT EVENTS AND RETAIL/COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES; AND PROVIDING DIGITAL DATA TRANSMISSIONS THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CREATING, IMPLEMENTING AND MAINTAINING WEBSITES FOR OTHERS; AND PROVIDING COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |