USPTO serial 75597115
UP2 ME!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UP2 ME!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H3B 4X5, CA
Montreal, Quebec H3B 4X5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lucille P. Nichols
LUCILLE P NICHOLS DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR THE TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION; PROVIDING AN ONLINE LINK TO NEWS, WEATHER, SPORTS, CURRENT EVENTS AND RETAIL/COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |