Drawing for MILLENIUM CHILDREN

USPTO serial 75597322

MILLENIUM CHILDREN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOLPIN, BRETT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENIUM CHILDREN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A. O'NEIL

MICHAEL A ONEIL MICHAEL A. O'NEIL, PC5949 SHERRY LN STE 820DALLAS, TX 75225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026toys, namely dolls and accessories thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 31, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance