USPTO serial 75597344
WORLD OF WONDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORLD OF WONDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey T. Imani
JEFFREY T IMANI MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC337 MAGNA DRAURORA, ON L4G 7K1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services namely, conducting horse races, amusement arcades, magic shows, aquarium exhibitions, movie theaters, virtual reality amusement rides, mechanical amusement rides, children's petting zoo, water slides, live musical and theatrical performances | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 1180482 ONTARIO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 1180482 ONTARIO INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WORLD OF WONDER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |