USPTO serial 75597355
FORTRESS INVESTMENT CORP.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORTRESS INVESTMENT CORP.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce J. Goldner
BRUCE J GOLDNER SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6522UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment services, namely, managing collective investment vehicles for real estate related assets, such services not being rendered through a consumer or commercial bank | ACTIVE | May 6, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |