Drawing for FORTRESS INVESTMENT CORP.

USPTO serial 75597355

FORTRESS INVESTMENT CORP.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORTRESS INVESTMENT CORP.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce J. Goldner

BRUCE J GOLDNER SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6522UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Investment services, namely, managing collective investment vehicles for real estate related assets, such services not being rendered through a consumer or commercial bankACTIVEMay 6, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 11, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 11, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 5, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance