USPTO serial 75597841
TOOTHJEWELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2000
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOOTHJEWELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kansas City, MO
Kansas City, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Mahoney
JOSEPH A MAHONEY SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL4520 MAIN ST STE 1100KANSAS CITY, MO 64111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | DENTAL APPLIQUES, NAMELY NON-PRECIOUS GEMSTONES FOR APPLICATION TO TEETH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |