USPTO serial 75597848
SURFACE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SURFACE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Surface Engineered Products Corporation
Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta T8L 3W4, CA
Other trademarks owned by Surface Engineered Products Corporation
Surface Engineered Products Corp.
Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta T8L 3W4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M KELLY
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | metal, ceramic and composite coatings applied internally and externally to industrial parts to provide corrosion, oxidation, carburization, wear, abrasion, and erosion protection, enhanced heat resistive properties | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Surface Engineered Products Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Surface Engineered Products Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named SURFACE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |