USPTO serial 75597863
HOMEFORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOMEFORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY L. VAN HOOSEAR
JEFFREY L. VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | REMOTE CONTROLS FOR ENTERTAINMENT DEVICES, NAMELY RADIOS, TELEVISIONS, STEREOS, CD PLAYERS AND DVD PLAYERS; REMOTE CONTROLS FOR LIGHTING AND THERMOSTAT CONTROLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES, NAMELY, HOUSEHOLD AIR CLEANERS, AIR CONDITIONERS, ROOM AIR HEATERS, AIR IONIZERS, DE-HUMIDIFIERS FOR DOMESTIC USE, ELECTRONIC AIR PURIFIERS FOR DOMESTIC USE, ELECTROSTATIC AIR CLEANERS FOR REMOVING MICRO-SIZED PARTICLES FROM THE AIR, EVAPORATIVE AIR COOLING UNITS FOR DOMESTIC USE, ELECTRIC CEILING FANS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USE, PORTABLE ELECTRIC FANS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE, HEAT PUMPS, HUMIDIFIERS, PORTABLE HEATERS, WATER TREATMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, WATER FILTERS AND WATER PURIFICATION PRODUCTS, NAMELY WATER FILTERS AND WATER FILTER CARTRIDGES FOR PRODUCING POTABLE WATER FOR DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |