USPTO serial 75597994
DOOTSIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOOTSIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenwich, CT
Greenwich, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD E MANCUSO
Richard E. Mancuso Whitman Breed Abbott & Morgan LLC500 West Putnam AvenueGreenwich, CT 06830UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Dolls, kites, basketballs, footballs, playground balls, balloons, toy mobiles, sand and sandbox toys, rocking horses, pin wheels, puppets, kick board floatation devices for recreational use; play tunnels, board games, reusable self adhering character stickers, baby multiple activity toys, baby rattles, bath toys, bean bags, toy construction blocks, crib toys, swimming goggles, infant toys, inflatable toys, manipulative puzzles and games, activity play mats composed of fabric, filling and plastic, play tents and houses, playsets for dolls, plush toys, toy record and tape players, ride on toys, snorkels, swim masks, swim fins, and play swimming pools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |