USPTO serial 75598434
DUET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DK-8000 Aarhus C, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Vogl
PETER D VOGL PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICAS,NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL AND BUSINESS COMMUNICATION SERVICES; TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES, FACSIMILE TRANSMISSIONS, RADIO AND TV BROADCASTING, INCLUDING THROUGH CABLE TELEVISION, BROADCASTING PROGRAMS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DELIVERY OF MESSAGES AND PAGES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION; LEASING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS, INCLUDING TELEPHONY APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |