USPTO serial 75599576
C++TEST!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C++TEST!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LeRoy T. Rahn
LEROY T RAHN CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR TESTING COMPUTER APPLICATIONS SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |