USPTO serial 75599585
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Markham, Ontario L3R 6G2, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Randall King
D RANDALL KING MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ONLINE ORDERING SERVICES FEATURING GOODS AND SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF FASHION, ELECTRONICS, COMPUTERS, CAMERAS, NEW TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS, HOME AND GARDEN, HEALTH AND BEAUTY, HOBBIES, GAMES, SPORTS, FITNESS, OUTDOORS, TRAVEL, FINANCE, INSURANCE, CHILDREN'S TOYS, GAMES, GIFTS, AUTOMOBILES, AUTO SUPPLIES, MOTOR HOMES, ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES AND OTHER VEHICLES, ALL PROVIDED VIA FREE-STANDING TERMINAL KIOSKS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |