Drawing for HOTEL PLAZA ATHENEE NEW YORK

USPTO serial 75599744

HOTEL PLAZA ATHENEE NEW YORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MERCALDI, ANTHONY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOTEL PLAZA ATHENEE NEW YORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela E. Weinstock

PAMELA E WEINSTOCK FRIED FRANK HARRIS SHRIVER & JACOBSONONE NEW YORK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Animal skins, hides, trunks for travel and traveling bags, umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks, whips, harness and saddlery; leather and imitation of leather goods made of these materials, namely, handbags, wallets, purses, briefcases and schoolbagsACTIVE—
024Fabrics for commercial and household use, namely, bed blankets, bed sheets, bed clothes, bed linens, table clothes not of paper and table linens; table linen, namely, coasters, curtains, pillowcases, table napkins, towels, bed sheets, and quilts, all made of silk, cotton, wool or rayon; silk, cotton, wool or rayon fabrics for clothingACTIVE—
025Full line of clothing, namely, t-shirts, shirts, sweaters, jackets, pants, and skirts, footwear and headwear; personal glovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 6, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jul 6, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 5, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 22, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance