USPTO serial 75599879
DENVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS R. MARSH
THOMAS R MARSH MARSH FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE, LLP3151 S VAUGHN WAY, STE 411AURORA, CO 80014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely hockey jerseys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |