Drawing for GOOD DOGGIES

USPTO serial 75600146

GOOD DOGGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD DOGGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TERESA L SEGALMAN

TERESA L SEGALMAN LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Books on pet training, behavior, health care and groomingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2002ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 3, 2002OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 27, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 26, 2000OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 26, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance