Drawing for SONNET

USPTO serial 75600235

SONNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD J. KLEIN

HOWARD J KLEIN KLEIN & SZEKERES, LLPSTE 7004199 CAMPUS DRIRVINE, CA 92612-4698

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer HardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 26, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 26, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 17, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 22, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 9, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 28, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance