USPTO serial 75600279
DOGS BEHAVING BADLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 13, 2002
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DOGS BEHAVING BADLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lasar Multimedia Promotions Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Lasar Multimedia Promotions Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Lasar Multimedia Promotions Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel F. O'Connor
GORDON E R TROY GORDON E R TROY, PCP O BOX 368CHARLOTTE, VT 05445UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lasar Multimedia Promotions Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lasar Multimedia Promotions Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lasar Multimedia Promotions Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named DOGS BEHAVING BADLY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |