USPTO serial 75600638
BABY PHAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABY PHAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | CHILDREN'S TOYS NAMELY DOLLS, BEANBAG DOLLS, SOFT SCULPTURE DOLLS, DOLL ACCESSORIES AND PLAYSETS THEREFOR, ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES, TOY FIGURINES AND ACCESSORIES, BALLOONS, TOY BANKS, BATH TOYS, INFLATABLE BATH TOYS, RIDE-ON TOYS, INFLATABLE RIDE-ON TOYS, FLYING DISCS, GAME EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A BOARD GAME A CARD GAME, JIGSAW PUZZLES, KITES, MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES, PLUSH TOYS, SOFT SCULPTURE PLUSH TOYS, WIND-UP WALKING TOYS, WIND-UP TOYS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |