Drawing for THE INTERNATIONAL MUSIC PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION

USPTO serial 75600675

THE INTERNATIONAL MUSIC PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE INTERNATIONAL MUSIC PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KRISTINA A. HANCOCK

KRISTINA A HANCOCK COWLEY & CHIDESTER, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 23296050 EL TORDORANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067-2329

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio cassette tapes concerning the music products industryACTIVE—
016A series of non-fiction books, journals, and other printed instructional and educational materials in the field of the music products industryACTIVE—
025Clothing and headgear, namely, hats, t-shirts, sweatshirts, shirts and jacketsACTIVE—
035Arranging and conducting trade show exhibitions and conventions in the field of the music products industryACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting workshops and seminars concerning sales strategies and marketing techniques for the music products industry and distributing educational materials in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2001PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 17, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance