USPTO serial 75600724
HARDWARE EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2572503Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 28, 2002
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HARDWARE EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy S. Gordet
Roy S. Gordet Law Office Of Roy S. Gordet98 Battery StreetSuite 601San Francisco, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail services featuring vacuum products for use in manufacturing systems that create vacuum chambers used in the manufacturing and industrial processing industries and in scientific research and development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Varian Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Varian Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Varian, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Varian, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HARDWARE EXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2000 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| May 3, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |