Drawing for ME TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75600737

ME TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ME TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. STRIKER

MICHAEL J STRIKER103 E NECK RDHUNTINGTON, NY 11743UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009data protection equipment, comprising, anti-virus software, computer hardware, firewalls, data encryption and decryption software for preventing unauthorized access to networks and terminals and computer programs for data protection and data transmission protection, namely, programs for developing methods for securing data processing equipment, preventing the penetration of computer viruses in data processing equipment and computer programs, recognizing data processing equipment infiltrated by computer viruses and removing viruses therefrom; computer programs for privilege protection, namely, programs for developing corresponding passwords and codes for access to data processing equipment and computer programs, and recognizing, removing, and excluding access of computer viruses on data processing equipment and computer programs; computer programs for encoding data on documents and in computer programs for cryptography protectionACTIVE—
035promoting the goods and services of others through distribution of printed materials, radio and television advertisements and placing advertisements on websites; market research and market analysis; negotiation of commercial transactions for third parties and contracts for the procurement and distribution of goodsACTIVE—
036banking services, namely, issuing credit cards, mortgaging securities for others, providing financial transactions, namely, bill payments services for others, investment of funds for others, credit consultation, namely credit inquiry and consultation, credit recovery and collection, financial records research, insurance administrationACTIVE—
042design and development of data protection equipment for others and technical consultation in the field of data protection equipment, all for privilege protection, cryptography protection and security and data transmission networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 11, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance